| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Without this patch, debugging information like the following will produce
FUNC records with no names, because the dumper (correctly) ignores the
DW_TAG_subprogram DIEs that lack DW_AT_low_pc/DW_AT_high_pc attributes, but
won't follow the DW_AT_abstract_origin link from the DIE that does have
code addresses to find its name.
<1><168>: Abbrev Number: 5 (DW_TAG_class_type)
<169> DW_AT_name : Foo
<2><183>: Abbrev Number: 7 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
<185> DW_AT_name : Foo
<18b> DW_AT_declaration : 1
<1><1b7>: Abbrev Number: 12 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
<1b8> DW_AT_specification: <0x183>
<1bc> DW_AT_inline : 2 (declared as inline but ignored)
<1><1dc>: Abbrev Number: 16 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
<1dd> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <0x1b7>
<1e1> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x8048578
<1e5> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x8048588
a=dmuir, r=jimblandy
git-svn-id: http://google-breakpad.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@520 4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This also includes some comments I promised Cary Coutant I'd write
about the appropriateness of processing attributes in EndAttributes
calls.
The Google C++ Style Guide requires each file to have an author notice
and a comment explaining the file's general purpose. For the record, I
don't think putting an author notice on the files is a good idea; it's
odd to have the original author retain prominence even if the file has
been heavily edited by others; the version control system answers this
question more accurately. This is only for Style Guide compliance. The
Apache group decided to discourage author annotations, partially for
these reasons:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-jmeter-dev/200402.mbox/%3C4039F65E.7020406@atg.com%3E
a=jimblandy, r=nealsid
git-svn-id: http://google-breakpad.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@518 4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We've gotten mixed advice from the lawyery types about whether this
matters. But it's easy enough to do.
a=jimblandy, r=nealsid
git-svn-id: http://google-breakpad.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@517 4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Style Guide.
The Google C++ Style Guide says that members of structures needn't
have names ending in underscores. The structure types in
google_breakpad::Module don't follow this rule.
a=jimblandy, r=nealsid
git-svn-id: http://google-breakpad.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@505 4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e
|
|
|
This adds DWARF support to the Breakpad Linux dumper. This is
implemented as two handler classes: google_breakpad::DwarfCUToModule
accepts data from dwarf2reader::CompilationUnit, and
google_breakpad::DwarfLineToModule accepts data from a
dwarf2reader::LineInfo, each populating a google_breakpad::Module with
the results. Behaviors specific to particular source languages are
handled by instances of a new class, google_breakpad::Language.
An input executable may contain both STABS and DWARF debugging
information: the dumper automatically recognizes what sorts of
information are available, and integrates the data into a single
output file.
All classes have unit tests, providing line and branch coverage of all
interesting code. Unit tests are written using the Google C++ Testing
Framework, and the Google C++ Mocking Framework where appropriate.
a=jimblandy, r=ccoutant
git-svn-id: http://google-breakpad.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@497 4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e
|
