From 2f2a8fe80a175494f9cedce942cc5f42bf6fbd82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jc_gargma Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:49:48 -0700 Subject: Updated to 5.6.7 --- ...ake_runtime-pm_wakeref_prior_to_unbinding.patch | 129 --------------------- 1 file changed, 129 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 0005-drm_i915_gem_Take_runtime-pm_wakeref_prior_to_unbinding.patch (limited to '0005-drm_i915_gem_Take_runtime-pm_wakeref_prior_to_unbinding.patch') diff --git a/0005-drm_i915_gem_Take_runtime-pm_wakeref_prior_to_unbinding.patch b/0005-drm_i915_gem_Take_runtime-pm_wakeref_prior_to_unbinding.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 3afe243..0000000 --- a/0005-drm_i915_gem_Take_runtime-pm_wakeref_prior_to_unbinding.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,129 +0,0 @@ -From e3d3fd13d0ac1e12848b4f2a57e9e4bf2b557bf0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Chris Wilson -Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:13:46 +0000 -Subject: drm/i915/gem: Take runtime-pm wakeref prior to unbinding - -Some machines require ACPI for runtime resume, and ACPI is quite kmalloc -happy. We cannot handle kmalloc from inside the vm->mutex, as they are -used by the shrinker, and so we must ensure the global runtime-pm is -awake prior to unbinding to avoid the potential inversion. - -<4> [57.121748] ====================================================== -<4> [57.121750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected -<4> [57.121753] 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7466+ #1 Tainted: G U -<4> [57.121754] ------------------------------------------------------ -<4> [57.121756] i915_pm_rpm/1105 is trying to acquire lock: -<4> [57.121758] ffffffff82263a40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.117+0x0/0x30 -<4> [57.121766] -but task is already holding lock: -<4> [57.121768] ffff888475a593c0 (&vm->mutex){+.+.}, at: i915_vma_unbind+0x21/0x50 [i915] -<4> [57.121868] -which lock already depends on the new lock. - -<4> [57.121869] -the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -<4> [57.121871] --> #1 (&vm->mutex){+.+.}: -<4> [57.121951] i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex+0xa2/0xd0 [i915] -<4> [57.122028] i915_address_space_init+0xa9/0x170 [i915] -<4> [57.122104] i915_ggtt_init_hw+0x47/0x130 [i915] -<4> [57.122150] i915_driver_probe+0xbb4/0x15f0 [i915] -<4> [57.122197] i915_pci_probe+0x43/0x1c0 [i915] -<4> [57.122202] pci_device_probe+0x9e/0x120 -<4> [57.122206] really_probe+0xea/0x420 -<4> [57.122209] driver_probe_device+0x10b/0x120 -<4> [57.122212] device_driver_attach+0x4a/0x50 -<4> [57.122214] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130 -<4> [57.122217] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 -<4> [57.122220] bus_add_driver+0x142/0x220 -<4> [57.122222] driver_register+0x56/0xf0 -<4> [57.122226] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2ff -<4> [57.122230] do_init_module+0x56/0x1f8 -<4> [57.122233] load_module+0x243e/0x29f0 -<4> [57.122236] __do_sys_finit_module+0xe9/0x110 -<4> [57.122239] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 -<4> [57.122242] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -<4> [57.122244] --> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: -<4> [57.122249] __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0 -<4> [57.122251] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 -<4> [57.122254] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.117+0x24/0x30 -<4> [57.122257] __kmalloc+0x48/0x320 -<4> [57.122261] acpi_ns_internalize_name+0x44/0x9b -<4> [57.122264] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x6b/0xd3 -<4> [57.122267] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x50 -<4> [57.122271] acpi_get_handle+0x8a/0xb4 -<4> [57.122274] acpi_has_method+0x1c/0x40 -<4> [57.122278] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x40/0xe0 -<4> [57.122281] pci_platform_power_transition+0x3e/0x90 -<4> [57.122284] pci_set_power_state+0x83/0xf0 -<4> [57.122287] pci_restore_standard_config+0x22/0x40 -<4> [57.122289] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x23/0xc0 -<4> [57.122293] __rpm_callback+0xb1/0x110 -<4> [57.122296] rpm_callback+0x1a/0x70 -<4> [57.122299] rpm_resume+0x50e/0x790 -<4> [57.122302] __pm_runtime_resume+0x42/0x80 -<4> [57.122357] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x15/0x60 [i915] -<4> [57.122435] ggtt_unbind_vma+0x24/0x60 [i915] -<4> [57.122514] __i915_vma_unbind.part.39+0xb5/0x500 [i915] -<4> [57.122593] i915_vma_unbind+0x2d/0x50 [i915] -<4> [57.122668] i915_gem_object_unbind+0x11c/0x260 [i915] -<4> [57.122740] i915_gem_object_set_cache_level+0x32/0x90 [i915] -<4> [57.122810] i915_gem_set_caching_ioctl+0x1f7/0x2f0 [i915] -<4> [57.122815] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0 -<4> [57.122818] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390 -<4> [57.122822] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x6f0 -<4> [57.122825] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x60 -<4> [57.122828] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20 -<4> [57.122830] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 -<4> [57.122833] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe - -Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/711 -Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson -Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld -Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191203101347.2836057-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk ---- - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- - 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) - -diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c -index 3f07948ea4da..ed2436db5dd2 100644 ---- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c -+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c -@@ -119,10 +119,23 @@ i915_gem_get_aperture_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, - int i915_gem_object_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, - unsigned long flags) - { -- struct i915_vma *vma; -+ struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm = &to_i915(obj->base.dev)->runtime_pm; - LIST_HEAD(still_in_list); -+ intel_wakeref_t wakeref; -+ struct i915_vma *vma; - int ret = 0; - -+ if (!atomic_read(&obj->bind_count)) -+ return 0; -+ -+ /* -+ * As some machines use ACPI to handle runtime-resume callbacks, and -+ * ACPI is quite kmalloc happy, we cannot resume beneath the vm->mutex -+ * as they are required by the shrinker. Ergo, we wake the device up -+ * first just in case. -+ */ -+ wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(rpm); -+ - spin_lock(&obj->vma.lock); - while (!ret && (vma = list_first_entry_or_null(&obj->vma.list, - struct i915_vma, -@@ -146,6 +159,8 @@ int i915_gem_object_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, - list_splice(&still_in_list, &obj->vma.list); - spin_unlock(&obj->vma.lock); - -+ intel_runtime_pm_put(rpm, wakeref); -+ - return ret; - } - --- -cgit v1.2.2-1-gc45e - -- cgit v1.2.1