1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
|
From 6ffd5925e2659e589d48b8dcaf06e0b3cc0f4d52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 21:14:52 +0000
Subject: drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding
RING_TAIL
If we rewind the RING_TAIL on a context, due to a preemption event, we
must force the context restore for the RING_TAIL update to be properly
handled. Rather than note which preemption events may cause us to rewind
the tail, compare the new request's tail with the previously submitted
RING_TAIL, as it turns out that timeslicing was causing unexpected
rewinds.
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851190us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: expired last=130:4698, prio=3, hint=3
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851192us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 66:119966, current 119964
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851195us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4698, current 4695
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851198us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695
^---- Note we unwind 2 requests from the same context
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851208us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851213us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 134:1508, current 1506
^---- But to apply the new timeslice, we have to replay the first request
before the new client can start -- the unexpected RING_TAIL rewind
<idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851219us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: submit { 130:4696*, 134:1508 }
synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851239us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=5, tail=0
synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851240us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[0]: status=0x00008002:0x00000000
^---- Preemption event for the ELSP update; note the lite-restore
synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851243us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: preempted { 130:4698, 66:119966 }
synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851246us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: promote { 130:4696*, 134:1508 }
synmark2-5425 2.... 1280851462us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4700, current 4695
synmark2-5425 2.... 1280852111us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4702, current 4695
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852296us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=0, tail=2
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852297us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[1]: status=0x00000814:0x00000000
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852299us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 130:4696!, 134:1508 }
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852301us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[2]: status=0x00000818:0x00000040
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852302us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 134:1508, 0:0 }
synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852313us : process_csb: process_csb:2336 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(*execlists->active) && !reset_in_progress(execlists))
Fixes: 8ee36e048c98 ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing")
Referenecs: 82c69bf58650 ("drm/i915/gt: Detect if we miss WaIdleLiteRestore")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200207211452.2860634-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 18 ++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.h | 8 ++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_types.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index d925a1035c9d..1b4784bfa7e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ static u64 execlists_update_context(struct i915_request *rq)
{
struct intel_context *ce = rq->hw_context;
u64 desc = ce->lrc_desc;
- u32 tail;
+ u32 tail, prev;
/*
* WaIdleLiteRestore:bdw,skl
@@ -1170,9 +1170,15 @@ static u64 execlists_update_context(struct i915_request *rq)
* subsequent resubmissions (for lite restore). Should that fail us,
* and we try and submit the same tail again, force the context
* reload.
+ *
+ * If we need to return to a preempted context, we need to skip the
+ * lite-restore and force it to reload the RING_TAIL. Otherwise, the
+ * HW has a tendency to ignore us rewinding the TAIL to the end of
+ * an earlier request.
*/
tail = intel_ring_set_tail(rq->ring, rq->tail);
- if (unlikely(ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL] == tail))
+ prev = ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL];
+ if (unlikely(intel_ring_direction(rq->ring, tail, prev) <= 0))
desc |= CTX_DESC_FORCE_RESTORE;
ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL] = tail;
rq->tail = rq->wa_tail;
@@ -1651,14 +1657,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
*/
__unwind_incomplete_requests(engine);
- /*
- * If we need to return to the preempted context, we
- * need to skip the lite-restore and force it to
- * reload the RING_TAIL. Otherwise, the HW has a
- * tendency to ignore us rewinding the TAIL to the
- * end of an earlier request.
- */
- last->hw_context->lrc_desc |= CTX_DESC_FORCE_RESTORE;
last = NULL;
} else if (need_timeslice(engine, last) &&
timer_expired(&engine->execlists.timer)) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c
index 374b28f13ca0..6ff803f397c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.c
@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ intel_engine_create_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int size)
kref_init(&ring->ref);
ring->size = size;
+ ring->wrap = BITS_PER_TYPE(ring->size) - ilog2(size);
/*
* Workaround an erratum on the i830 which causes a hang if
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.h
index ea2839d9e044..5bdce24994aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.h
@@ -56,6 +56,14 @@ static inline u32 intel_ring_wrap(const struct intel_ring *ring, u32 pos)
return pos & (ring->size - 1);
}
+static inline int intel_ring_direction(const struct intel_ring *ring,
+ u32 next, u32 prev)
+{
+ typecheck(typeof(ring->size), next);
+ typecheck(typeof(ring->size), prev);
+ return (next - prev) << ring->wrap;
+}
+
static inline bool
intel_ring_offset_valid(const struct intel_ring *ring,
unsigned int pos)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_types.h
index d9f17f38e0cc..3cd7fec7fd8d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_types.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct intel_ring {
u32 space;
u32 size;
+ u32 wrap;
u32 effective_size;
};
--
cgit v1.2.2-1-gc45e
|
