| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Comparing unicode string without case sensitive is rather expensive
because each codepoint must be converted, which is non trivial for
unicode.
This patch introduce a new argument of ::match() taking the encoded
url in lowercase. This way, the conversion can be done only once
for a lot of rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to make special matching rules, we need specialization of the
implementation depending on the type of rule.
The previous AdBlockRule was entierly based on regexp. The new one
is only a factory to a AdBlockRuleImpl, and delegate everything to
this implementation.
This will allow faster specialization of the ad block rules in the
future.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The method pattern imply the rule is implemented with a regexp, which
is what we should try to avoid in the future for performance reasons.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Speed up compilation & linking on Win, Lin & Mac. Step 1
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This (squashed) commit adds this new feature in rekonq, letting
people to simply "forgot" adblock and let rekonq do everything for it
I added:
- a new (rekonq) adblock widget
- an asyncronous method to update rules from the net every TOT days
- a better AdBlockManager management.
What it is actually missing is the adp protocol support to add new
subscriptions to adblock. This will come the next week.
For now this part seems stable and needs just testing :)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this commit, we save (at least) 3 bytes for each AdBlockRule defined
(and probably more than 3!).
In my installation I have about 100 rules... :)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This time I decided for speed..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I had a lot of problems implementing it because I started working on
assuming 2 things:
1) konqueror implementation works (it's not true, I found a bug! To guess what,
try loading current rekonq vs current konqueror against kde-apps.org)
2) Arora's implementation can be easily ported to kcm technology. Another wrong assumption,
based on MVP implementation.
Sorry for spamming master branch, guys.
|
|
|
|
| |
Sorry about that :(
|
|
|