rekonq.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	WARNING COMMIT --> FIRST REKONQ 2 IMPORT	Andrea Diamantini	2012-12-10	1	-176/+0
\| \| \| \|	Preparing repo to merge rekonq2 code...
*	Clean up headers && fix compilation with (the upcoming) qt 4.8.2	Andrea Diamantini	2012-04-20	1	-9/+10
\|
*	Get sure certificate chain HAS valid (not empty) identifiers	Andrea Diamantini	2012-02-06	1	-1/+6
\|
*	removed one strange " sign	Andrea Diamantini	2012-02-06	1	-1/+1
\|
*	Krazy fixes	Andrea Diamantini	2012-01-19	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	- QL1S/QL1C - single-char QString efficiency - explicit ctors - normalized signals & slots
*	clean up	Andrea Diamantini	2011-07-25	1	-14/+14
\| \| \| \| \| \|	- QL1S - one stupid kDebug less - codingstyle
*	SSL fixes	Andrea Diamantini	2011-07-23	1	-37/+19
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	I hope I addressed here a number of fixes in my first implementation: - working hasSSLValid() function (checking cert validity and chain errors) - escaping certificate strings - typos (Sha256/Md5, supportedCipherBits/usedCipherBits) - encryption check (at least I hope so) CCMAIL: rich@kde.org
*	Improve SSL management	Andrea Diamantini	2011-07-20	1	-6/+27
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Hopefully addressed the problems against our (new) SSL code. CCMAIL:timb@nth-dimension.org.uk
*	Md5 is NOT sha256...	Andrea Diamantini	2011-07-19	1	-1/+1
\|
*	Calm down kDebug messages	Andrea Diamantini	2011-07-19	1	-2/+0
\|
*	style cleanup	Andrea Diamantini	2011-07-18	1	-37/+37
\|
*	Last fixes for the SSL dialog improvements	Andrea Diamantini	2011-07-18	1	-23/+51
\| \| \| \|	Now we are ready for the fight...
*	SSL rewamp, one step to finish!	Andrea Diamantini	2011-07-18	1	-3/+22
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	These are last changes to clean up and improve SSL rekonq communications. It is yet missing a proper SSL errors API integration. You just need to wait for the next commit...
*	Improving SSL widget & dialog, step 3	Andrea Diamantini	2011-07-18	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Now they really seem "similar" to the ones provided by Google Chrome and Firefox. They all need further improvements, anyway...
*	Improving SSL Widget and Dialog	Andrea Diamantini	2011-07-18	1	-0/+122
	While the widget "copies" and "rethink" Google Chrome actual one, the dialog has been implemented starting from the comparison between the ones we have in KDE, Google Chrome's and Firefox's. I have to start from somewhere...