diff options
| author | Gabriele Svelto <gsvelto@mozilla.com> | 2018-08-04 00:59:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ted Mielczarek <ted.mielczarek@gmail.com> | 2018-08-13 19:12:00 +0000 |
| commit | 16e08520e6027df4bf1934abbfd5e1a088ffb69c (patch) | |
| tree | e80f0e6a8b46b31a9dd56c12dddebb51e1895795 /configure | |
| parent | Set new ARM64 context flags (diff) | |
| download | breakpad-16e08520e6027df4bf1934abbfd5e1a088ffb69c.tar.xz | |
Add support for parsing the DW_AT_ranges attributes
This enables the DWARF reader to properly parse DW_AT_ranges attributes
in compilation units and functions. Code covered by a function is now
represented by a vector of ranges instead of a single contiguous range
and DW_AT_ranges entries are used to populate it. All the code and tests
that assumed functions to be contiguous entities has been updated to
reflect the change. DW_AT_ranges attributes found in compilation units
are parsed but no data is generated for them as it is not currently needed.
BUG=754
Change-Id: I310391b525aaba0dd329f1e3187486f2e0c6d442
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1124721
Reviewed-by: Ted Mielczarek <ted.mielczarek@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'configure')
| -rwxr-xr-x | configure | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
@@ -6098,7 +6098,7 @@ else We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -6144,7 +6144,7 @@ else We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -6168,7 +6168,7 @@ rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -6213,7 +6213,7 @@ else We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -6237,7 +6237,7 @@ rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; |