aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/client/windows/unittests/exception_handler_test.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorhansl@google.com <hansl@google.com@4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e>2010-05-13 21:00:43 +0000
committerhansl@google.com <hansl@google.com@4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e>2010-05-13 21:00:43 +0000
commitbcf885c8079b1742bfd93de722afceb26237ce4f (patch)
treefe9e624dfbc969e41f8008f4dddd2a7aabe7750a /src/client/windows/unittests/exception_handler_test.cc
parentMoved exception_handler_test to the more aptly named exception_handler_death_... (diff)
downloadbreakpad-bcf885c8079b1742bfd93de722afceb26237ce4f.tar.xz
Added a death test for the pure virtual function call.
Added a test for the minidump generated by a pure virtual function call. Changed the pure virtual function call handler so that it creates a minidump with Exception info and a stack. Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/2050013 git-svn-id: http://google-breakpad.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@597 4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e
Diffstat (limited to 'src/client/windows/unittests/exception_handler_test.cc')
-rwxr-xr-xsrc/client/windows/unittests/exception_handler_test.cc115
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/src/client/windows/unittests/exception_handler_test.cc b/src/client/windows/unittests/exception_handler_test.cc
index b8b58762..ed1cec64 100755
--- a/src/client/windows/unittests/exception_handler_test.cc
+++ b/src/client/windows/unittests/exception_handler_test.cc
@@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ class ExceptionHandlerTest : public ::testing::Test {
// Deletes temporary files.
virtual void TearDown();
- void DoCrash();
+ void DoCrashInvalidParameter();
+ void DoCrashPureVirtualCall();
// Utility function to test for a path's existence.
static BOOL DoesPathExist(const TCHAR *path_name);
@@ -127,7 +128,7 @@ void ExceptionHandlerTest::ClientDumpCallback(
full_dump_file = dump_file.substr(0, dump_file.length() - 4) + L"-full.dmp";
}
-void ExceptionHandlerTest::DoCrash() {
+void ExceptionHandlerTest::DoCrashInvalidParameter() {
google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler *exc =
new google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler(
temp_path_, NULL, NULL, NULL,
@@ -144,6 +145,43 @@ void ExceptionHandlerTest::DoCrash() {
printf(NULL);
}
+
+struct PureVirtualCallBase {
+ PureVirtualCallBase() {
+ // We have to reinterpret so the linker doesn't get confused because the
+ // method isn't defined.
+ reinterpret_cast<PureVirtualCallBase*>(this)->PureFunction();
+ }
+ virtual ~PureVirtualCallBase() {}
+ virtual void PureFunction() const = 0;
+};
+struct PureVirtualCall : public PureVirtualCallBase {
+ PureVirtualCall() { PureFunction(); }
+ virtual void PureFunction() const {}
+};
+
+void ExceptionHandlerTest::DoCrashPureVirtualCall() {
+ google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler *exc =
+ new google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler(
+ temp_path_, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::HANDLER_PURECALL,
+ kFullDumpType, kPipeName, NULL);
+
+ // Disable the message box for assertions
+ _CrtSetReportMode(_CRT_ASSERT, 0);
+
+ // Although this is executing in the child process of the death test,
+ // if it's not true we'll still get an error rather than the crash
+ // being expected.
+ ASSERT_TRUE(exc->IsOutOfProcess());
+
+ // Create a new frame to ensure PureVirtualCall is not optimized to some
+ // other line in this function.
+ {
+ PureVirtualCall instance;
+ }
+}
+
// This test validates that the minidump is written correctly.
TEST_F(ExceptionHandlerTest, InvalidParameterMiniDumpTest) {
ASSERT_TRUE(DoesPathExist(temp_path_));
@@ -161,7 +199,78 @@ TEST_F(ExceptionHandlerTest, InvalidParameterMiniDumpTest) {
// child process, the server registration will fail due to the named pipe
// being the same.
EXPECT_TRUE(server.Start());
- EXPECT_EXIT(this->DoCrash(), ::testing::ExitedWithCode(0), "");
+ EXPECT_EXIT(DoCrashInvalidParameter(), ::testing::ExitedWithCode(0), "");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(!dump_file.empty() && !full_dump_file.empty());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(DoesPathExist(dump_file.c_str()));
+
+ // Verify the dump for infos.
+ DumpAnalysis mini(dump_file);
+ DumpAnalysis full(full_dump_file);
+
+ // The dump should have all of these streams.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(mini.HasStream(ThreadListStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(full.HasStream(ThreadListStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(mini.HasStream(ModuleListStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(full.HasStream(ModuleListStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(mini.HasStream(ExceptionStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(full.HasStream(ExceptionStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(mini.HasStream(SystemInfoStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(full.HasStream(SystemInfoStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(mini.HasStream(MiscInfoStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(full.HasStream(MiscInfoStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(mini.HasStream(HandleDataStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(full.HasStream(HandleDataStream));
+
+ // We expect PEB and TEBs in this dump.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(mini.HasTebs() || full.HasTebs());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(mini.HasPeb() || full.HasPeb());
+
+ // Minidump should have a memory listing, but no 64-bit memory.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(mini.HasStream(MemoryListStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(mini.HasStream(Memory64ListStream));
+
+ EXPECT_FALSE(full.HasStream(MemoryListStream));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(full.HasStream(Memory64ListStream));
+
+ // This is the only place we don't use OR because we want both not
+ // to have the streams.
+ EXPECT_FALSE(mini.HasStream(ThreadExListStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(full.HasStream(ThreadExListStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(mini.HasStream(CommentStreamA));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(full.HasStream(CommentStreamA));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(mini.HasStream(CommentStreamW));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(full.HasStream(CommentStreamW));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(mini.HasStream(FunctionTableStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(full.HasStream(FunctionTableStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(mini.HasStream(MemoryInfoListStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(full.HasStream(MemoryInfoListStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(mini.HasStream(ThreadInfoListStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(full.HasStream(ThreadInfoListStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(mini.HasStream(HandleOperationListStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(full.HasStream(HandleOperationListStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(mini.HasStream(TokenStream));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(full.HasStream(TokenStream));
+}
+
+
+// This test validates that the minidump is written correctly.
+TEST_F(ExceptionHandlerTest, PureVirtualCallMiniDumpTest) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(DoesPathExist(temp_path_));
+
+ // Call with a bad argument
+ ASSERT_TRUE(DoesPathExist(temp_path_));
+ std::wstring dump_path(temp_path_);
+ google_breakpad::CrashGenerationServer server(
+ kPipeName, NULL, NULL, NULL, ClientDumpCallback, NULL, NULL, NULL, true,
+ &dump_path);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(dump_file.empty() && full_dump_file.empty());
+
+ // This HAS to be EXPECT_, because when this test case is executed in the
+ // child process, the server registration will fail due to the named pipe
+ // being the same.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(server.Start());
+ EXPECT_EXIT(DoCrashPureVirtualCall(), ::testing::ExitedWithCode(0), "");
ASSERT_TRUE(!dump_file.empty() && !full_dump_file.empty());
ASSERT_TRUE(DoesPathExist(dump_file.c_str()));